"At Times, Filings by Pro Se Litigants and Attorneys Alike Are Wholly Nonsensical, but Pointing That Out" Doesn't Justify Recusal

Why did Sarepta shares plunge recently? How will Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger impact railroads? What caused Nvidia to gain despite US-China tech tensions? Why is Trump criticizing Fed Chair Jerome Powell? How will Trump's proposed EU tariffs affect markets? What led to Netflix stock drop despite earnings beat? Why are AI regulations causing industry pushback?

"At Times, Filings by Pro Se Litigants and Attorneys Alike Are Wholly Nonsensical, but Pointing That Out" Doesn't Justify Recusal

reason.com/volokh/2025/07/18/at-times-filings-by-pro-se-litigants-and-attorneys-alike-are-wholly-nonsensical-but-pointing-that-out-doesnt-justify-recusal

Words of wisdom from Judge Jennifer Dorsey (D. Nev.) last week in Naessens v. Breslin:
[The self-represented plaintiff] takes issue with an order of mine in an unrelated case calling a pro se plaintiff's filings "wholly nonsensical" and argues that such language "suggests an undue…

This story appeared on reason.com, 2025-07-18 12:53:18.