"Plaintiff Simply Wants to Erase Any Evidence That He Initiated a Case," but "Plaintiff Cannot Unring a Bell."

Why did Starbucks profits plunge recently? How will JPMorgan take over Apple’s credit card? What impact will US-China tariff talks have? Why are Novo Nordisk shares crashing? How will Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger affect railroads? Why is Starbucks launching new protein drinks? What caused Spotify’s latest revenue miss?

"Plaintiff Simply Wants to Erase Any Evidence That He Initiated a Case," but "Plaintiff Cannot Unring a Bell."

reason.com/volokh/2025/07/21/plaintiff-simply-wants-to-erase-any-evidence-that-he-initiated-a-case-but-plaintiff-cannot-unring-a-bell

From Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti (E.D. Mich.) Report and Recommendation in Lopez v. Chase, just adopted Thursday by Judge Shalina Kumar (quite correctly, I think):
Seven months [after filing this pro se case], Plaintiff filed three successive motions, all aiming to erase his case from…

This story appeared on reason.com, 2025-07-21 12:01:06.